How to analyze tweets and RT on YOUR content

October 6, 2009

Jennifer Van Grove reports on a interesting tool TweetMeme Analytics to follow tweets on your content and how they spread – check here her post “TweetMeme Analytics Show You How Retweets Spread on Twitter”.

Based on her test, one can follow retweets and measure the influence of the ‘retweeters’ – see pic below.

I have started a 30 days trial today… let’s see how this works 😉


A Key difference between Twitter and (Facebook or Linkedin)

October 5, 2009

IMO, Computer world made an interesting point yesterday in their “The_Business_Sense_of_Twitter” article:

"It's not cool on Facebook or LinkedIn to
friend people you don't know at all. But
Twitter is about information, and "following"
people you don't know -- merely because of
the interesting things they might say -- is the rule."

FB and LI are oriented on the relation between people: you need to know someone a little to add it to your network and “listen” to him or her. Twitter is centered on hearing the message first. Definitely complementary tools.
Pointing the obvious? Well, so much noise made comparing the Twitter and Facebook, I think it does not hurt.

Bookmark and Share

“Facebook” is the top keyword searched by French people

May 5, 2009

As described today by LMI, a french IT online Newspaper – in french-, Mediametrics reports the top keyword queried by French people in March 2009 to be … (tadaaaam!)… “Facebook” (38.3 M.queries), way before eBay (13.8 M.q.), Orange (11.5 M.q) and YouTube (10.2 M.q).

Facebook is also ranked as the 9th site in term of visits (13.7 M. uniq visitors in march).

French web users are now 63% of the French population that is 33.9 M.
LMI is also commenting the fact that Facebook does not appear in the French TOP50 ranking sites based on advertisement and service offered, seing this as a “proof that the social network has found its public, but is still searching for a sound revenue model.”

Having the longer…. tail, in social media

March 31, 2009

It seems most social media (SM) tools are twisted by some users in the following ways: they build collections of “friends” . They compete and rank themselves in term of who has the biggest number of friends or follower or subscribers. To be fair, most SM tools rank users based on the number of “friends” or followers they have which kind of tend to grow the tendancy.

So what’s is the benefit?

Long tail blue bird

Obviously no one can really read and answer to 300+ followers tweets nor know and discuss with 1000+ contacts. It’s not anymore about sharing content and about being interested in knowing others. So, again, what’s the benefit?

Well there is a real benefit in being the first to apply successfully a tool for business. This success become the reference and your name makes it to the board of fame – not mentioning reward might be even more substantial. The idea is to be talked about, to get famous, to be the buzz Guru. Once you are there, you have super power, no one will question your vision, everyone wants to be in direct contact with you and your network reach exponential grow, the social media nirvana.

What are the protections?

Not that many. Twitter has an internal protection system consisting in temporary disabling an account receiving too many followers as describde in this post from Social POPStars (the name says it…). They call it “blewing” their account… and do so out of pure popular virality! But not all users with big number of followers are genuine.

How to spot fake follower count?

In a post name “How to spot a twitter user with a fake follower count” reports of experiences made  to artificially grow one’s follower count and gives a method to spot a “faker” through nice & easy graphical analysis.

How to check identity and behavior?

Well, as Amnesiablog is proposing, by following for a time, checking content and unfollowing. That’s all there is for now.

Seems blacklisting is also coming soon. Amnesiablog talks about building such a blacklist.The first know blacklist made out of goodwill,, has been closed by its creator due to a brutal loss of confidence in Twitter. What is the next solution to counter Twitter spam? When will there be an internal rating or badrating available to users?

Bookmark and Share

Why are corporate blogging?

March 25, 2009

Below are a few notes made while listening to Chris Brogan video cast  posted on his blog titled “What should corporations do with their blogs”.  Chris asked several company – AMD, GM, Pepsico, BestBuy, … – how they are using their blog to talk about important issues with their customers.

[This is not a transcript – please listen to the video as it is fully loaded with high value content].

Corporations are blogging to engage the customer, get feedback, build a conversation and establish a link. Promoting the product is not enough to establish and maintain the link. Real content and personal relationship is needed.

Three predicates to corporate blogging

Now in order to engage real conversation with customers, corporate needs to believe in three predicates:

  • consider social media as a real tool – not entertainment,
  • realize that customer are intelligent and as a group are able to figure out what they want.
  • be willing to act transparently and discuss what is of real interest to customers – be it product evolution or crisis situations.

If one is missing, it’s likely the blogging communication will fail. Now assuming, these three beliefs are fully accepted, then real blogging can happen.

Why do corporate blog?

The whole idea behind corporate blogging is to be able to get feedback information from customer at a faster rate.Yes, learn from customers to improve product, services, communication, identify new market niches: in the end it’s all about competitiveness and being faster than competition and prepare for your future.

In addition to identifying future product evolutions, blogging can also be used to handle crisis situation.

How to blog?

It’s just human interaction, you are here to help customers. It’s a person to person relationship. Like in the real life, you build connections on your personality.

How important is the man behind the brand?

Most of the speakers gathered by Chris are Big brands, so the question was intended to clarify if blogging was doable for small companies with small or no budget.

The question was rephrased as follow “How important is the group behind the man blogging for the brand?“. Blogging or social media activity might  be a one man work but this man needs to have the ability to get support from the rest of the company or needs to be able to bend the company strategy when getting important feedback.

Do not be afraid as a company to try, to test social media. Do not be afraid to talk with people hating your brand. This might be your one opportunity to discuss with them, to clarify something maybe to turn them into your brand champion.

What advices do you give to a social evangelist?

  • do not be afraid at taking a risk while blogging, it’s easier to make a mistake as a human than it is to do one as a corporation. Mistakes and excuses from a human help building a link,
  • if looking for a job in this space, take the job because you see a future in social media,
  • keep your social media activity honest, have integrity, have transparency – the whole system is based on trust.
  • while blogging, inject personality – it’s all about people -the brand is not enough.
  • does not matter the size of the company. You need to learn about fast fails: try and learn from it.
  • you’ll find internal resistance against blogging and social media – keep up the work, this is the future, resistance will disappear.

Bookmark and Share

Is Twitter really the right tool for PR?

March 23, 2009

In a former post – What’s in for B2B marketing in Twitter? – I was making a reference to Matt Rhodes listing 8 ways to use Twitter for PR in its post “How to use Twitter for PR“:

  1. Tracking
  2. Monitoring
  3. Live-reporting
  4. Journalism
  5. Activism
  6. Public Relations
  7. Political
  8. Communications
  9. Crisis Communications.

If, I do agree on the first two and the last one, I’m skeptic as of the others.

  • Live reporting and Journalism: well 140 characters might be a little short to do this. It’s barely headlines -just like the one scrolling at the bottom of TV News show –  that is all title effect and no much meet to feed on.
  • Activism and Political use of Twitter: I guess recent use of Twitter by the democrats is a good sample of Activism. To me it is more an application of a communication to early-adopters and a project communication to a group, that is focused, short term, rooted in time. I’m not sure the link with the large-scale group can really survive the project. The link to the early adopter group will likely stay.
  • Communication and Crisis management: understanding communication as basic way to send messages then yes, Twitter is one way to route short messages.. Crisis management seems to have happened lately a few time. Same use as SMS here but with wider audience and Web relaying.

It’s pretty basic to say so as it is always the case in marketing, but with Twitter, one needs to know the group being targeted and it’s interest in order to send the right short messages and maintain the link. But this is not enough: Twitter is a new tool and as reported by Marketing & Innovation Blog in this post (french content) – Twitter, un outil à manier avec précautions… Cas pratique ! – there are really two main profiles in Twitter’s followers:

  • fierce Twitter users: they are early adopters, well versed in Twitter etiquette and requiring real personal content,
  • occasional users: they twitt from time to time in addition to email and other social media tools, mainly testing it.

In this post, Marketing & Innovation Blog is giving real feedback on a communication campaign having used Twitter as one of the tools to promote a buzz. In this campaign, including the Twitter fierce users in the target revealed to be a bad move. They perceived the communication as SPAM, not following the rules and reacted to it strongly. This category of Twitters users being versed in Web tools, the net reacted as a soundboard and amplified the negative feedback.  Targeting error lead to missed operation. – See at the end of Marketing & Innovation ‘s post their suggestion for avoiding this type of mistakes.

So bottom line, I think Twitter is really interesting in monitoring a brand, in testing an idea, in maintaining a link with early adopters (testing an idea, beta testing) and also for time limited and project oriented short reporting. In my opinion, Twitter is not the right tool for PR in term of reaching an open-wide audience and real time must always be handled with care.

Bookmark and Share

Paris Barcamp on Online Reputation Management 4th of April 2009 (French: e-reputation Barcamp à Paris 4 Avril 2009)

March 20, 2009

I will be attending the “e-Reputation” / online reputation management (ORM) Barcamp (#link in French) in Paris next 4th of April. The three main topics are:

  • How to manage my Personal Branding
  • Corporate Branding: internet tells a lot about a company (Corporate, HR, finance…)
  • Profile certification, who does what.

Will likely post a feedback here. I look forward to see you there…

For those of you wondering, a Barcamp is an open, participatory workshop-events, whose content is provided by participants (Picture and text source Wikipedia).

%d bloggers like this: